In his book, Harun Yahya criticize the evolutionists ideology. He stated that, ape and human chromosomes are not 98% identical but are too different for evlution to explain.

Darwinians were lying to us when they insisted that the genetic matter of apes and humans are 98% identical. During the last 12 years, there has been a steady flow of scientific discoveries informing us that Chimpanzee and human chromosomes are so remarkably different that it is inconceivable for the ape genome to evolve into the human genome.

For example:
In 2000, Nature published a scientific paper entitled “Chimpanzee and human Y chromosomes are remarkably divergent in structure and gene content.” (Nature, by the way, is the most respected peer reviewed scientific journal for evolutionary genetics.)
They found that:
• The human Y chromosome has twice as many genes as the Chimpanzee Y chromosome. Humans have at least 78 genes and Chimpanzees have only 37.
• The Y chromosomes of Chimpanzees and humans are radically different in the arrangement of their genes.
Both of these facts make it impossible for apes to have evolved into humans because there are no genetic mechanisms that would account for the vast differences between the ape and human Y chromosomes.

The two chromosomes are so different it is like comparing the chromosomes of humans to those of chickens.

The Author emphasizes that ape to human evolution is impossible because apes and humans cannot add genes to their genomes. In order for apes to add genes, they would have to have a genetic mechanism to generate new genes and insert them into their chromosomes. But apes do not have any “gene generating system.” nor do apes have a “gene insertion system.” This means that “ape to human evolution” theory is missing the genetic mechanisms necessary for evolution to actually take place. This proves “ape to human evolution” is impossible.

He then concluded that the theory of evolution are a complete violation of reason and logic.

Darwin explains that the nature came into existence by chance. Could chance produce such an organized system from a mud? Can chance make that smallest organized system increasingly complex and produce an entity such as a human being? Can chance teach a monkey to speak, to make compliments, to think, to build palaces, to found civilizations and nations, to build ships and discover continents, to set up laboratories or to perform experiments by investigating the cells that comprise them? What coincidence can endow an ape with a soul? The answer to each one of these questions is very clear and definite: chance can produce neither a human being nor the cell, the smallest component thereof.
“If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely breakdown.” (Charles Darwin)

Since evolutionists believe in this impossibility, then let them take a suitable amount of mud and wait for it to produce spontaneously, first a single cell, then amoeba, fish, lizards, horses, apes and finally human beings. Then let them watch those human beings design cars, make discoveries and found civilizations. In fact, even the most dyed in the wool evolutionist knows this can never happen, but they imagine that by making this claim together with Latin terms and a weighty style it somehow becomes credible.

To believe that all the living things we see on Earth, the flowers with their matchless beauty, fruits, flavors, butterflies, gazelles, rabbits, panthers, birds, and billions of human beings with their different appearances, the cities built by these human beings, the buildings they construct, and bridges all came about by chance from a collection of mud, means taking leave of one’s senses. The fact that large numbers of people believe in clumsy bird hacks flying cyrus app such nonsense in no way legitimizes it; on the contrary, it shows that we are looking at a miracle. A miracle took place 150 years ago, when an old man with an amateur interest in biology began to bring a huge mass of people under his influence with the senseless ideas he produced from his imagination during a sea voyage.


“Mutations are small, random and harmful. They rarely occur and the best possibility is that they will be ineffectual. These four characteristics of mutations imply that mutations cannot lead to evolutionary development. A random change in a highly specialized organism is either ineffectual or harmful. A random change in a watch cannot improve a watch. It will most probably harm it or at best be ineffectual. An earthquake does not improve a city, it brings destruction.” B. G. Ranganathan, Origins, 1988
“In practice mutants die, are sterile, or tend to revert back to the wild type.” Michael Pitman, Adam and Evolution, 1984
• The direct effect of mutations is harmful.
• Mutations add no new information to an organism’s DNA, but cause abnormalities.
• In order for a mutation to be transferred to the subsequent generation, it has to have taken place in the reproductive cells of the organism.

A Question of Probability

A probability of 1 chance in 10950 to form a single useful protein. Robert Shapiro, professor of chemistry at New York University and a DNA expert, calculated the probability of the coincidental formation of the 2000 types of protein found in a single bacteria (there are 200,000 different types of protein in a human cell) to be 1 in 1,040,000.97. Could it be that a cell was formed under the conditions of a primordial earth ravaged by earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and thunderstorms?
“The likelihood of the spontaneous formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40,000 noughts after it …it is big enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of Evolution. There was no primeval soup neither on this planet nor on any other, and if the beginnings of life were not random, they must have been the product of purposeful intelligence.” Chandra Wickramasinghe, University of Cardiff, Wales
No evolution in Quran
We created man from a mingled drop to test him, and We made him hearing and seeing. (Surat al-Insan, 2)
The Theory of Evolution Is a Deception of Satan, and Satan’s Deception Is Weak

God reveals in the Qur’an that Satan has vowed to turn people away from the true path, to deceive them, to make them believe in nonsense and perversions, and set snares for them:

“I will lead them astray and fill them with false hopes. I will command them and they will cut off cattle’s ears. I will command them and they will change God’s creation.” Anyone who takes Satan as his protector in place of God has clearly lost everything. He makes promises to them and fills flappy bird them with false hopes. But what Satan promises them is nothing but delusion (Qur’an, 4:119-120)

In another verse God reveals that Satan says he will never be able to mislead His sincere servants (Qur’an, 15:39-40).

It is easy to free oneself from Satan’s snares. All one has to do is to think honestly. Anyone who thinks honestly will see that the claims of the theory of evolution are untrue. Evolutionists, too, would see this manifest truth if they could free themselves from the effect of their own circles, their concerns to the effect that “If I say I do not believe in evolution what will my colleagues think of me?” and will cease to believe in such an impossible scenario as evolution. In one verse God reveals:

As for those who guard against evil, when they are bothered by visitors from Satan, they remember and immediately see clearly. (Qur’an, 7:201)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: